(07-19-2012 04:00 PM)skwid Wrote:  

(07-19-2012 01:38 PM)Brad-n Wrote:  Oh yeah! I completely forgot about the rock wall. I don't even remember what they called it. Does anybody else?

Peak Exposure... and I can tell you exactly why they bought it (or who convinced lagoon to buy it).

I actually am curious.

I'm curious too!

At the time that they bought it traveling climbing walls were popular and one of the rides management staff knew someone that they could get it cheap from and convinced Dave to buy it. The wall was cheap, and not really a loss for lagoon, the labor that they used to sit and watch it gather dust that was a different story.

Oh I'm just samurai lover but can't login so got a new one

(07-18-2012 03:21 PM)Coasters Wrote:  I highly doubt this. My personal feeling on this is that it would turn out to be another Peak Exposure type of attraction. Meaning they would pay an operator to stand there and do nothing all day. I don't see Lagoon getting a bungee tower. 2. They would not tear out Top e. for a in my opinion dumb bungee tower. 3. S&S builds bungee towers, now Stan isn't with the company anymore but I think the new owners won't waste the money on bungee towers.

A bungee type attraction would be an absolute waste of money and therefore I say I do not see Lagoon ever getting one.


All this let alone the insurance and risk involved would be too risk for Lagoon to even have a reasonable thought about this.
. . .





ok you don't have to be mean about it and it seams to me you are defending top E a non insisting thing any more

Where does your friend get his info?